(insert disclaimer about this being my own views – no that of MySQL AB)
Slashdot | MySQL and SCO Join Forces
Some people seem to think that porting your application to a newer version of an OS, having a trial version of your subscribtion-based support shipping with every copy of that OS and access through that OS vendors reseller channel is a bad thing.
Granted, a lot of people think that certain actions of said OS vendor are just plain retarded. Myself included – it would be much better if they actually focused on products. That being said, there’s more than one OS vendor that does just plain dumb stuff – or, to use the more emotive “evil” word.
Of course, there’s part of the /. crowd that seem to think we must be evil for porting to a SCO platform – but by their silence (and sometimes “screw you guys, I’m going to X RDBMS”) it must be okay for others to do it (note that X RDBMS already supports SCO platforms)?
Besides, anybody who’s really used MySQL will know how easy it is to move your database from one platform to another – really empowering you to make sure you OS vendor gives you the best deal possible – because you can easily move to where the grass is greener.
What is the difference between the SCO-MySQL deal and the SCO-PostgreSQL/EnterpriseDB deal?
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1846635,00.asp
They were both announced at the same time. They are both doing the same thing (providing certified binaries to run on SCO).
As usual, MySQL gets bad press and PostgreSQL gets ignored.